PROUD BOYS BOMBSHELL: THE BIG FINISH!! SHOCKING voicemail from DOJ Puppet Jeremy Bertino EXONERATING his former brothers left on the voicemail of Defendant Dominic Pezzola’s WIFE!

Twitter
Telegram
Email
Print

TOP 5 LIES AND BOMBSHELLS FROM THE WRAP UP OF EX PROUD BOY JEREMY BERTINO'S PERJURY

To the dismay of humorless lead government shill Roger Parloff, the Proud Boys jury and what was left of the DOJ’s credibility was shattered on Tuesday morning of this week, when Steven Metcalf, counsel for Dominic Pezzola played a voice message their star ‘cooperator’ Mr. Bertino sent to Defendant Pezzola’s WIFE.

Here are the top Five Lies, beginning with that voicemail that expose Bertino’s true motivations for taking the stand last week.

Lie #1: Jeremy Bertino was had implicit “knowledge” of the Proud Boys ‘plan’ to oppose the US Government by force.

Jeremy Bertino was not only NEVER informed of ANY plan, objective, or details regarding anything to do with the ‘Boots on the Ground’ rally plans for Proud Boys on January 6th.

And it gets worse…

  Dominic Pezzola is a loving husband father and a veteran.  He grew up in a diverse community raised by 1st and 2nd generation immigrants.  He has a wife and 2 daughters he hasn’t been able to see in 2 years.  They miss him dearly, their family is not complete without him.  

LIE # 1 - JEREMY BERTINO WAS SOME KIND OF WITNESS TO SEDITION

REALITY: Jeremy Bertino’s story changed every time he told it depending on who was asking, admitted lying to the FBI, changed his story on the stand, and to the January 6th committee. Jeremy was offered almost $13,000 to relocate and minimal to no time in jail despite heavy felony gun charges totaling up to 10 years prison time. Bertino’s incentives to lie for the government are vast and various. 

CROSS with STEVEN METCALF (Defense Attorney for Pezzola): 

METCALF: Mr. Bertino, is that your voice?

BERTINO: Sounds like it.

METCALF: Okay. I’d ask that we fast-forward to 40 seconds into this video, please.

(The voice memo plays for the court. An awkward silence and uncomfortable shifting in seats sets in as the memo ends.)

TRANSCRIPT: “But I have no doubts, man. He’s a man of honor – in all honesty, it sucks. Uh… (sigh) that he’s in this situation, ya know? Uh, I hope you know, I’m sure he’s told you that, you know that was NOT, none of what happened there that day was not any part of our plan or anything that like that, that was completely organic and spontaneous and… uhh, you know, so I don’t – I don’t want you to be upset with the club thinking that we ordered him to do it or something, cause we definitely did not. Uh, you know- and it sucks, that’s its being blown out of proportion the way it is. I mean… it’s a [expletive] window, that’s all it was.  A [expletive] window. But they’re gonna make it more than what it is for their purposes, so. But either way, just let him know I love him. I still stand behind him. You know? Still Proud of Your Boy, and I wish the best and hope the best for him. We’ll continue to pray for him as an organization, as a group, and, that’s the best we can do right now.”

LIE #2: TARRIO ‘WITHELD’ HIS PLANS FROM THE CLUB AND CHANGED THE PLAN LAST MINUTE

REALITY: Starting with the fact that Tarrio was not PRESENT on J6 due to his arrest for burning a political banner. He served FIVE MONTHS for property damages, instead of a standard and appropriate probation and fine, Tarrio held more than one DOCUMENTED voice call with then-leadership sent out to wide swathes of the club, to ensure SAFETY of the entire group.

Enrique Tarrio had nothing to hide, so maybe the government should just consider that they’re not that great at contextual comprehension, instead.

LIE# 3 TARRIO ‘CREATED’ THE 1776 DOCUMENTS USED TO ATTEMPT A COUP AGAINST THE NOT-YET-ELECTED PRESIDENT BIDEN ON JANUARY 6th.

REALITY: Crypto Queen and Clout-Chaser Extraordinaire, Erika Flores, AKA ‘Eryka Gemma’ took Samuel Armes’s original work and beefed it up to her own agenda, as revealed in her private text messages.  The FBI then used that faulty information to bury the Proud Boys via Enrique Tarrio. 

She disappeared and plead the 5th when her decisions came back to haunt her. 

The Government then explicitly LIED to Mr. Bertino to utilize Flores’ handiwork to extract Bertino’s cooperation, with a hacked up frame-job of a melodramatic plan the former chairman never opened, distributed, or used.

During his cross, Nayib Hassan, counsel for Tarrio took up this issue with the disgraced former member: 

The Documents were either DIRECTLY authored by Samuel Armes, NOT Tarrio, to ‘War Game’ a sit-in protest of the contested elections, OR they were more likely taken and restructured by Erika Flores, Aka. Eryka Gemma, the ‘Crypto-Queen of Miami’ and ONLY by Ms. Flores, in attempt to capture Mr. Tarrio’s attention… or secure a criminal conviction for the government. 

Mr. HASSAN. During that meeting, (Bertino’s 1st FBI interview) they gave you the ability to look at documents. Correct?
BERTINO: A. I believe so. Yeah.
Q. And during the course of the meeting, as we previously discussed here, they gave you a document, reference, the 1776 document. Correct?
A. Yes.
Q. And you’ve had multiple times to see the document here in court. Correct?
A. I have not seen the whole document here in court. No.
Q. Well, you’ve seen parts of the document. Correct?
A. I don’t believe it’s ever actually been shown to me in court. No.
Q. Well, you had the ability to see it on March, correct, in your meeting with the Government?
A. I did get a brief look at it. Yes.
Q. And when you had the opportunity to look at it, they, in fact, told you that Tarrio created the document. Correct?
A. I believe they did say something to that the effect, that he created it. Yes.
Q. And then, subsequent to that, they told you, Well, they created it — he created it and he made some redactions or made some assistance. Correct? He created it with assistance? Is that –
A. That sounds familiar.
Q. Still during this meeting was Mr. Kenerson. Correct? This same prosecutor that’s sitting next to you — sitting next to me? Correct?
A. Yes.
Q. And Agent Nicole Miller was there. Correct?
A. Yes.
Q. Agent Nicole Miller is actually the one that made the statement that says that Tarrio created the document.
A. I believe so.
Q. Well, in fact, you don’t know if Mr. Tarrio created the document?
A. I don’t know.
Q. And in fact, they misled you that he created the document. Correct?
A. Again, I don’t know if he created it, so I can’t say that they misled me.
Q. And you don’t know if he created it with assistance. Correct?
A. I don’t know that for sure.

As Ms. Flores chose to plead the fifth for her deposition to the January 6th committee, the reality of her motivations, and the disinterest of Merrick Garland’s Gestapo in investigating her any further, the truth will likely never be known. But one thing is for certain, of the top 5 unraveled lies under Mr. Bertino, this plotline may have the most teeth.

However, in HIS testimony to the January 6th Committee, Samuel Armes seemed to have outlined a quiet affection for Ms. Flores, and mistrust of Tarrio. His mistrust would be proven to be directed at the wrong party.

MR ARMES: So there was a time — so, you know, because Erika and I were business partners, anytime she was in the Miami area and I was coming down to Miami, I’d always make an effort to see her if there was anything that we had to discuss about business. So I believe one time she had an Airbnb in, I believe it was West Palm Beach, to the best of my recollection. And when I arrived at that Airbnb, she was there with Enrique, which obviously made me incredibly uncomfortable. But I stuck around to talk to her for a bit. And Enrique was trying to get me to help him figure out a way to make money off of selling T-shirts online, which was a pretty weird request. And they wanted me to, like, brainstorm with them on, like, T-shirt ideas and setting up some kind of warehouse in Miami to help underserved kids. So that and seeing him at a restaurant with Erika were the only two times I’ve met him in person. Yeah. And had zero interest, you know, ever even meeting him. Those weren’t even planned meetings. He just happened to be there with Erika, who I was there to meet with.

But the question of ‘who wrote the documents is found in their direct messages to one another. (Hint: It’s not Tarrio.)

In the exhibits offered by the government in trial, many of Erika Flores’ messages seemed to intentionally try to implicate Tarrio into some bizarre style of protest, and Flores explicitly refers to the plans as HERS, showing ownership… NOT as a joint effort. “The benefactor of my brilliance”, and “If you don’t like MY plan,” Flores claims ownership and mind mastery of the sit-in multiple times.

And yet, despite all her hard work… Tarrio never even opened, distributed, or utilized her handiwork. 

Defense Counsel Nayib Hassan addressed this in his cross of Mr. Bertino when probing about the misconduct of the FBI and DOJ Prosecutor Erik Kenerson during their interrogation of Bertino.

HASSAN: You don’t even know if he even opened up the document?
BERTINO. I don’t know that for sure.
Q. Did Mr. Kenerson at any point in time rebuke or condemn the statements made by Ms. Miller?
A. I don’t know. Not that I remember.
Q. Did he condemn the statements made by Ms. Miller regarding Tarrio — regarding Enrique looking at the document, creating the document or modifying it with assistance?
A. I don’t recall that. But I’d have to look at the transcripts to be able to verify one way or another.

The March 8, 2022 interview in question reads as follows:

(Bertino is handed a copy of the ‘1776 Returns’ documents authored by Armes/Flores to review, as part of the FBI/DOJ interview. Agent Miller will be taking the stand this coming week, along with the same prosecutor, Erik Kenerson, who conducted this interview with Bertino to secure his cooperation.)

BERTINO: (A long pause comes over the recording as he reviews the documents) Wow. Yeah, this I had never seen. That I can remember, I have never seen anything like this. And he was sent this?
MILLER: He created this.
BERTINO: Enrique created this? I thought he was sent this from somebody else.

Erik Kenerson and Agent Miller knew this to be a lie but didn’t bother correcting the record.

They needed a statistic in their conviction rates, after all.

LIE# 4 The Culture of the Proud Boys was Violence, Force, etc. and included a mentality of protesting ‘By Any Means necessary.’

REALITY: Proud Boys cultivated a culture of SELF DEFENSE, and asked MOSD Members to NOT get intoxicated 

Mr. Smith asked you a number of questions about an agreement to use force, suggesting you didn’t have one. Do you remember those questions?
A. I do.
Q. Now, when you entered your guilty plea in this case, you had the elements of the offense read to you, did you not?
A. I did.
Q. Any hesitation on your part as to whether your conduct met those elements?
A. No.
Q. Mr. Pattis asked you about your plea agreement where it says “analogous to treason.” Do you remember that question?
A. I do remember that.
Q. Did that give you pause when you read it?
A. No.
Q. Why not?
A. Because I understood that that was the closest — that was the closest thing on the books to seditious conspiracy, which was treason.

Erik Kenerson during his redirect tried to elicit that despite the facts, gun charges, and consistent testimony from Bertino that he doesn’t want to go to prison, it was instead the “CULTURE” of the Proud Boys that lead to an IMPLIED understanding for Mr. Bertino that he’d unknowingly committed sedition, according to Mr. Kenerson’s loose definition of course. OOPS.

The coercion it took to get Jeremy on board with his own brainwashing was seemingly lost to Mr. Kenerson.

Remember, that information is something that was often suggested both in the published transcript excerpts from Kenerson’s March 8th, 2022 interview with his own witness, AND on the stand during trial. This conclusion was not one that Bertino arrived at without help.

Q. Did you have any hesitation in entering your guilty plea as a result of reading that?

A. I did not.
Q. Tell me about the agreement to use force. Where is your — what — where did your understanding that the agreement involved the use of force come from?
A. It was a regular topic of conversation in all the chats that we were in, that I was in. It was common knowledge that, if everything else failed, there was nowhere — there was no other option but to go into a civil war or revolution. This was the constant topic of conversation all the time in the majority of the chats that I was in around that time.
Q. You also said that you’ve not been arrested on these charges. Correct?
A. That’s correct.
Q. At the time that you agreed to plead guilty in this case, had charges been filed against you at that point?
A. No. I agreed to plead guilty prior to the charges being filed.
Q. Does that include gun charges?
A. It does.

This is a slight of hand, Bertino was aware at the time that he WOULD be charged with those crimes upon walking away from the cooperation. Potentially immediately upon leaving the building.

Q. So at the time you entered your guilty plea, you had been — or at the time you agreed to plead guilty, you had been charged with neither seditious conspiracy nor with the gun charges?
A. That’s correct.
Q. Did you plead guilty for any reason other than the fact that you are guilty?
A. No.
(Mind you, Bertino also testified that NONE of the defendants gave him any details of a plan, the ‘goal’ of the plan is something Bertino came up with on his own,
Q. You were asked about the number of meetings that you had with the Government. Do you remember a lot of those questions?
A. I do.
Q. Remind us. March 2022, why were you not fully forthcoming with the FBI?
A. There’s a number of reasons, but I was trying to protect myself and protect everyone else from getting into any trouble. I mean, this is probably the number one reason why I wasn’t honest; I was trying to shape things so that we looked innocent. You know, I believed the narrative that we were all telling ourselves about it, but it wasn’t true.
Q. What was the narrative?
A. Well, that it was all spontaneous and there was — you know, I mean, that’s what — that’s what we were putting out to everyone. That’s what everyone was putting out. But, you know, looking back at it, I know that’s not true. So that’s how I know I lied.

People don’t LOOK BACK on a lie, when a lie is told, someone knows they are telling it. THAT, ironically, is how any reader knows, Bertino’s real lie… is the one on the stand being told for the Jury.

Bertino often found himself at the ‘front lines’ where HE wanted to be, not because he was appointed. He took it upon himself to create the infamous ‘Boots on the Ground’ chat the government is now using to incriminate every minor comment made by any American added to the chat that Jeremy, NOT Tarrio… created. The government intentionally avoids this fact as much as possible. 

LIE# 5 The Culture of Violence lead to the Conflicts between Proud Boys and Antifa. Proud Boys went ‘looking’ for trouble.

THE REALITY: Jeremy Bertino’s regular use of steroids, and recreational use of Cocaine lead HIM to being one of the most violent and rabble rouser members. Bertino regularly pushed to make trouble despite calls from leadership for him to stop or control himself.

Steven Metcalf touched on this in his cross.

METCALF: All right. So you were asked questions by Attorney Hernández about you taking the pain pills after December 12th and your stabbing. Right?
BERTINO: Yes.
Q. Were you also on antibiotics at that time?
A. Yes. I believe I was.
Q. I heard that you mentioned about doing another cycle around that time, and I didn’t first get what that was. Were you on steroids at that time?
A. I was, before I got stabbed.
Q. So steroids, pain pills, OxyContins, antibiotics. Correct?
A. I wasn’t actually doing them — after I got home from the hospital, I was not doing any testosterone.
Q. Okay. So you were doing it up until that point in time?
A. Correct.
Q. Were you doing OxyContin before December 12th or only after you got stabbed?
A. Only after I was stabbed.
Q. Did you finish your steroid cycle right before you were stabbed?
A. No.
Q. How far before you were stabbed did you finish your last steroid cycle?
A. I didn’t finish it. I was in the middle of it.
Q. Okay. So you were still taking it. So when we saw that video of you yesterday yelling at the crowd, you were on steroids at that time. Is that fair to say?

I was taking testosterone. Yes.
Q. You were taking steroids or you were taking testosterone? And you were injecting into your body?
A. I was.
Q. Any other drugs? Were you taking cocaine at the time?
A. Not at the time I was stabbed. No.
Q. How about after you were stabbed?
A. I did once. Yes.
Q. What about before you were stabbed?
A. Yes, I did.
Q. Did you frequently use cocaine up until the point that you were stabbed December 12th, 2020?
A. I wouldn’t say frequently. I did it once in a while.
Q. What’s “once in a while” to you?
A. Every couple of months, maybe, if that.
Q. Okay. Not every couple of weeks?
A. No.
Q. So every couple of months you would use cocaine while you were injecting testosterone. Is that correct?
A. I don’t think the two ever overlapped. No.
Q. So you never did cocaine while you were doing a cycle of steroids. Is that what you’re saying?
A. Yes.
Q. So you always made sure that your cycle of steroids was completed before you chose to sniff a line. Is that accurate?
A. No. I don’t think that was accurate. I only did testosterone for a few months before the stabbing. And again, it was very infrequent that I ever used cocaine.
Q. Okay. But you did use it occasionally before December 12th and after December 12th. Is that fair to say?
A. Only once after and probably — leading up to that, maybe three times that year before.

In other words, Bertino’s rabble rousing was factually due to Bertino and Bertino alone, not due to the Proud Boys.

And often, the Boys worked to curtail Bertino’s tendency to run off halfcocked and behave less-than intelligently, or respectfully.

In fact, Bertino is a twice divorced, military deserter, prior felon, who self-described as feeling like an outcast, who found a home for himself within a diverse male drinking club, that focused on the proximity of shared values and brotherhood to make better men, and for a little over $10,000, he tried to saddle his friends with up to and even over 20 years in prison. 

Bertino let the court know that he’s in the process of removing his “3rd Degree” Proud Boy tattoos.

Regrettably, The Proud Boys could not be reached for comment of concern or even feigned mild interest.

Condemned USA is the leading January 6th Legal Advocacy, click here to contribute to the attorney’s they’ve appointed to help #freetheboys

JANUARY 6TH LEGAL ADVOCACY: https://www.givesendgo.com/G3MZB

To give to the Commissary, Families, and Individuals in this Trial, see the links below:

Nordean https://www.givesendgo.com/SupportEthanNordean

Biggs https://www.givesendgo.com/SSGBDF

Rehl https://www.givesendgo.com/defendzach

Tarrio https://www.givesendgo.com/G385N

Pezzola https://www.givesendgo.com/helpdom

0 Item | $0.00
View Cart